In partnership with

Sponsored

Your company data could be worth $100k–$3 million

There's a new channel of revenue that has just been unlocked for companies with over 20 people that have been around longer than a year. 

Few know it, but AI labs now let you monetize your company’s operational data, and they're spending $15 billion this year on it to train the next frontier of LLMs. Your workflows, documentation, processes, and internal convos like Slack are extremely valuable and they're paying anywhere from $100k to $3 million for it per company.

Before you ask, all the data is anonymized and cleaned before it's sent to a Lab. Bezel (Y combinator backed) helps find a data partner that is the best fit for you.

The Drops
Today's drop

🛠️ Scrapling Scrapes Everything, Even Cloudflare

⭐ 92.6k · D4Vinci/ScraplingRepo

Every operator hits the same wall eventually: a site that just will not give up its data. Cloudflare challenge, JS-only render, API hiding behind a login wall. Most of us bolt together three libraries and a prayer. Today's lead Drop is one library that does the whole job, fetch, render, parse, export, and does not flinch at the stuff that usually sends you back to Stack Overflow at midnight.

A Python scraping framework that handles everything from one request to a full crawl, stealth browsers included.

Most scraping stacks break the moment a site adds JS rendering or a Cloudflare challenge, forcing you to stitch together a headless browser, a parser, and a retry loop by hand.

Quick start: run it from Python, the CLI, or your agent through its MCP server and Agent Skill.

Catch: stealth browser mode adds overhead you do not need for simple static pages.

Open the repo →

HubSpotAffiliate

HubSpot Marketing Automation, visual workflows that send the email, set the task or move the deal when a contact does something. See how HubSpot works We may earn a commission.

modelcontextprotocol/serversRepo ⭐ 91.7k

The reference MCP servers from the protocol's own steering group, built to teach you the SDK, not to run in production. Catch: these are reference implementations for learning the SDK, not production-ready servers.

kanzoRepo ⭐ 844

A 4.5 MB kanban board and MCP server in one binary, so you and your agents share one task list. Catch: it is a brand new project, so expect rough edges as the binary matures.

moonshine-ai/moonshineRepo ⭐ 11.3k

An on-device speech toolkit for voice agents, no API key, no account, works across Python, JS, iOS and more. Catch: you trade cloud-model accuracy ceilings for the privacy and speed of running locally.

From Our Partners

100+ Claude Code hacks to ship code 10X faster

Top engineers at Anthropic say AI now writes 100% of their code.

Are you using AI to write yours?

These 100+ Claude Code hacks show you exactly how. Sign up for The Code and get:

  • 100+ Claude Code hacks — free

  • The Code newsletter — learn the latest AI tools and skills to code faster in 5 mins a day

Start Here

New here? Start with The Awakening. It's free, it takes one sitting, and it's where every reader should begin.

Take The Awakening →

Turn a messy pile of notes into goals you can actually check off

Start Here is one prompt from our pack, every issue, tested on ChatGPT and Claude. Copy it, paste it into the free app you already use, and fill in the four bits in capitals: what you scribbled down over the last few weeks, the stretch of time you are planning for, what success would look like if someone asked you, and any real figures you already have on hand.

I wrote these notes down over a few weeks and never tidied them up. Somewhere in here is what I actually want the business to do. Turn it into a short list of goals I can check off, or fail, without arguing with myself about it.

My notes:
[THE NOTES]

The stretch of time these goals cover: [THE PERIOD]
How I would know at the end that it went well: [WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE]
Figures I already have out of my own records: [MY NUMBERS]

Give me, in this order:

1. Two or three goals. No more. Each one a sentence a person could say out loud, about what is different at the end, not about what I will be busy doing. If my notes carry more than three, the extras go in section 4 rather than getting squeezed in.

2. Under each goal, up to three results that would settle it. A result is something I can count, look up, or point at on a date: a figure out of my own records, a thing that either exists or does not, a yes or no somebody else gives me. Each result carries the date it gets checked, taken from the stretch of time I gave you. Where I gave you a starting figure, write the result as going from that figure to a target left blank in square brackets for me. Do not choose a target for me. Where I gave you no starting figure, say which of my records that figure would come out of, and mark the result as not measurable yet.

3. Activities dressed up as results. Any line in my notes that sounds like a goal but is really a job to do: running a campaign, redoing the website, getting better at something. Quote my words, say what would have to be true for it to count as a result instead, and keep it out of section 2.

4. What to cut, and why. Goals from the notes that did not make the top three, each with the reason it lost: it repeats another one, it is not mine to decide, or nothing in the notes says how it would ever be checked.

5. The one line to read every week. Out of everything above, the single result I should look at most often, and where I go to look at it.

Rules. Everything comes from my notes and my figures. Do not invent a figure, a percentage, a date or a customer. Do not set a target I did not give you; a blank in square brackets is the right answer. If I wrote "no numbers yet", section 2 says for every result where the figure would come from, marks the list as not measurable yet, and section 5 becomes the first figure I should start writing down. If I wrote "not sure" for what good looks like, build the goals from the notes alone and put your reading of what good looks like at the top of section 1 as a question for me. If the notes carry only one real goal, give me one; do not pad to three.

The line that makes it work: "Do not invent a figure, a percentage, a date or a customer. Do not set a target I did not give you; a blank in square brackets is the right answer." Most goal-setting prompts fill the gaps with plausible-sounding numbers. This one refuses to guess for you, so what comes back is something you can actually trust enough to act on.

TRY THIS: open whatever notes app has your last few weeks of scattered thinking in it, copy the messiest paragraph you can find, and paste it in as your notes. Two minutes, no cleanup required first.

This is one of 100 in the Aigent prompt pack. The other 99, plus guided builds with Mike on video, are inside the Aigent membership: Join the Aigent membership. Seven days free, then $29 a month. One click to stop.

EARN FROM HOME

Get paid to train AIAffiliate

AI companies pay people to rate, fix and check what their models write. Expert roles list $120 to $150 an hour, remote, for people with real professional experience in finance, software, healthcare operations or consulting. Browse live roles and apply free.

See open AI training roles →

We earn a referral fee if you're hired through this link. It never changes your pay.

Frontier Signals

Anthropic updated Claude Code's system prompt to refuse recreations of specific existing video games. Original games, genre games, and games built from your own designs and assets still work fine; the block targets a copy of a named game, even if it is renamed or called original. (The Verge AI)

The New York Times is suing Brave for scraping its content and passing it on to third parties, including Anthropic and Perplexity. The suit claims Brave built a 30-billion-page index with an unidentified crawler that left publishers unable to block it, a liability question every team buying scraped data should be watching. (TechCrunch AI)

Vercel's MCP server now renders live deployments as an interactive card inside ChatGPT and other chat clients that support MCP Apps. You get build logs, status, and commit details without leaving the chat window, one less tab to context-switch into during a deploy. (Vercel Blog)

Sam Altman argued that local inference wastes scarce hardware, since the world's limited memory chips sit in personal machines doing nothing most of the day. The operator counter-argument writes itself: idle hardware you own beats a rate limit you do not control, and plenty of us run local models exactly because uptime isn't negotiable. (r/LocalLLaMA)

Recommended reading

If you like The Aigent, a small group of operator-tier publications worth your inbox: see the shortlist.

Before You Go

Reply and tell me what you are scraping that keeps fighting back. I want to hear the site that beat your stack before Scrapling showed up.

See you Wednesday.

Haven't taken The Awakening yet? It's free and it's where we'd start. Take The Awakening →

Want to reach builders shipping with AI every weekday? Advertise with The Aigent. The Aigent stays free for everyone, and reader support keeps it that way: Support The Aigent.